Argentina vs Sweden: Manufacturing, value added
Manufacturing, value added over time
- Argentina
- Sweden
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.8% against 0.5% in Sweden, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.6 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Sweden ahead.
Argentina ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 135th of 190 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -1.8% | 2.2% | 4.0% | Sweden |
| 1990s | 2.6% | 4.6% | 2.1% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 2.6% | 1.0% | 1.7% | Argentina |
| 2010s | -0.1% | 2.9% | 3.0% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 1.2% | 0.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manufacturing, value added, Argentina or Sweden?
- Argentina, at 0.8% against 0.5% in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in manufacturing, value added between Argentina and Sweden?
- 0.3%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sweden?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Sweden rank globally for manufacturing, value added?
- Argentina ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 135th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Manufacturing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) major division C and is defined as the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.