Sweden vs Zambia: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Sweden
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 41.1% against 36.9% in Sweden, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 6th of 149 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.8% | 4.6% | 19.2% | Sweden |
| 1970s | 24.8% | 4.9% | 19.8% | Sweden |
| 1980s | 25.3% | 5.9% | 19.4% | Sweden |
| 1990s | 30.2% | 2.1% | 28.0% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 34.9% | 29.2% | 5.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Sweden or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 41.1% against 36.9% in Sweden as of 2015.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Sweden and Zambia?
- 4.2%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zambia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2015.
- How do Sweden and Zambia rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Sweden ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 6th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).