Sri Lanka vs Palestine: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Sri Lanka
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 2.1% against 2.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 114th and Palestine ranks 111th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.8% | 2.4% | 1.4% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 3.2% | 1.0% | 2.2% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.0% | Palestine |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.0% | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Sri Lanka or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 2.1% against 2.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Sri Lanka and Palestine?
- 0.1%, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Palestine?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2021.
- How do Sri Lanka and Palestine rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Sri Lanka ranks 114th and Palestine ranks 111th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).