Poland vs Thailand: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Poland
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 22.4% against 21.8% in Poland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 34th and Thailand ranks 33rd of 149 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.3% | 8.3% | 9.0% | Poland |
| 1970s | 21.0% | 4.6% | 16.5% | Poland |
| 1980s | 22.3% | 4.3% | 18.0% | Poland |
| 1990s | 16.7% | 20.7% | 4.0% | Thailand |
| 2000s | 17.5% | 32.7% | 15.2% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 23.6% | 30.7% | 7.1% | Thailand |
| 2020s | 20.2% | 22.4% | 2.2% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Poland or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 22.4% against 21.8% in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Poland and Thailand?
- 0.6%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Thailand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2021.
- How do Poland and Thailand rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Poland ranks 34th and Thailand ranks 33rd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).