Latvia vs United Arab Emirates: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Latvia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 12.2% against 10.8% in Latvia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 66th and United Arab Emirates ranks 63rd of 149 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.8% | 13.9% | 0.9% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 8.9% | 14.0% | 5.1% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Latvia or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 12.2% against 10.8% in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Latvia and United Arab Emirates?
- 1.4%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Arab Emirates?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Latvia ranks 66th and United Arab Emirates ranks 63rd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).