Kenya vs Mauritius: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Kenya
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 5.6% against 5.6% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 85th and Mauritius ranks 84th of 149 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 5 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.3% | 3.5% | 5.9% | Kenya |
| 1970s | 7.9% | 3.8% | 4.1% | Kenya |
| 1980s | 7.3% | 2.0% | 5.3% | Kenya |
| 1990s | 4.1% | 1.2% | 2.9% | Kenya |
| 2000s | 3.2% | 2.6% | 0.6% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 6.0% | 6.7% | 0.7% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 5.6% | 8.0% | 2.4% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Kenya or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 5.6% against 5.6% in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Kenya and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mauritius?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Mauritius rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Kenya ranks 85th and Mauritius ranks 84th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).