Ireland vs Kyrgyzstan: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Ireland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 1.5% against 1.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 120th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 123rd of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.8% | 1.8% | 16.0% | Ireland |
| 2000s | 13.9% | 2.3% | 11.6% | Ireland |
| 2010s | 6.9% | 1.5% | 5.4% | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Ireland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ireland, at 1.5% against 1.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Ireland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.2%, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Ireland ranks 120th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 123rd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).