Hong Kong vs Vietnam: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Hong Kong
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 29.9% against 27.7% in Hong Kong, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 24th and Vietnam ranks 22nd of 149 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.8% | 10.7% | 3.1% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 51.8% | 13.2% | 38.6% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 128.3% | 25.0% | 103.3% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 107.5% | 30.3% | 77.2% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Hong Kong or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 29.9% against 27.7% in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Hong Kong and Vietnam?
- 2.2%, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Vietnam?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Vietnam rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Hong Kong ranks 24th and Vietnam ranks 22nd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).