Hong Kong vs Norway: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Hong Kong
- Norway
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 27.7% against 27.1% in Norway, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Norway ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 24th and Norway ranks 25th of 149 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4.9% | 20.7% | 15.8% | Norway |
| 1980s | 6.3% | 19.8% | 13.5% | Norway |
| 1990s | 12.7% | 22.7% | 10.0% | Norway |
| 2000s | 51.8% | 26.0% | 25.8% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 128.3% | 31.9% | 96.4% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 107.5% | 25.5% | 82.0% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Hong Kong or Norway?
- Hong Kong, at 27.7% against 27.1% in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Hong Kong and Norway?
- 0.6%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Norway?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Norway rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Hong Kong ranks 24th and Norway ranks 25th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).