Hong Kong vs Malta: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Hong Kong
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 30.9% against 27.7% in Hong Kong, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Malta ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 24th and Malta ranks 21st of 149 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 5 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4.9% | 4.6% | 0.3% | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 6.3% | 5.3% | 1.0% | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 12.7% | 15.2% | 2.5% | Malta |
| 2000s | 43.3% | 26.6% | 16.8% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 129.4% | 14.5% | 114.9% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 107.5% | 29.6% | 77.9% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Hong Kong or Malta?
- Malta, at 30.9% against 27.7% in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Hong Kong and Malta?
- 3.2%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malta?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Malta rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Hong Kong ranks 24th and Malta ranks 21st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).