Finland vs France: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Finland
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 32.9% against 32.4% in Finland, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was France ahead.
Finland ranks 16th and France ranks 14th of 149 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and France in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.9% | 16.0% | 2.1% | France |
| 1970s | 17.0% | 20.1% | 3.0% | France |
| 1980s | 17.3% | 20.8% | 3.6% | France |
| 1990s | 23.8% | 28.9% | 5.1% | France |
| 2000s | 33.8% | 25.7% | 8.1% | Finland |
| 2010s | 28.1% | 32.3% | 4.2% | France |
| 2020s | 28.3% | 31.6% | 3.3% | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Finland or France?
- France, at 32.9% against 32.4% in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Finland and France?
- 0.5%, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and France?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
- How do Finland and France rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Finland ranks 16th and France ranks 14th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).