Eritrea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Eritrea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.5% against 0.3% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.9 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Eritrea ranks 137th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 140th of 149 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 0.3% | 1.8% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Eritrea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Eritrea, at 0.5% against 0.3% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2011.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Eritrea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.2%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Eritrea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Eritrea ranks 137th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 140th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).