El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- El Salvador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 2.0% against 1.9% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
El Salvador ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 114th of 149 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8% | 7.9% | 7.0% | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 0.8% | 5.3% | 4.5% | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 1.5% | 1.9% | 0.4% | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 1.2% | 3.1% | 1.9% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, El Salvador or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 2.0% against 1.9% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 1998.
- How do El Salvador and Sri Lanka rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- El Salvador ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 114th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).