Czechia vs South Korea: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Czechia
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 42.1% against 38.9% in Czechia, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
Across all 28 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 8th and South Korea ranks 5th of 149 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.0% | 36.9% | 14.9% | South Korea |
| 2000s | 27.3% | 45.0% | 17.7% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 48.5% | 12.1% | South Korea |
| 2020s | 36.5% | 45.8% | 9.2% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Czechia or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 42.1% against 38.9% in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Czechia and South Korea?
- 3.2%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and South Korea?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and South Korea rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Czechia ranks 8th and South Korea ranks 5th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).