Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Congo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 8.8% against 7.8% in Congo, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 149 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 27.9% | 26.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 1.8% | 28.3% | 26.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | 3.5% | 8.9% | 5.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 6.5% | 8.8% | 2.3% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 8.8% against 7.8% in Congo as of 2001.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.0%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2001.
- How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Congo ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).