Colombia vs Peru: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Colombia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 3.6% against 3.1% in Colombia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 100th and Peru ranks 98th of 149 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6.8% | 7.1% | 0.3% | Peru |
| 1980s | 5.5% | 5.8% | 0.3% | Peru |
| 1990s | 5.3% | 4.0% | 1.3% | Colombia |
| 2000s | 5.0% | 2.1% | 2.9% | Colombia |
| 2010s | 4.6% | 5.1% | 0.5% | Peru |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 5.3% | 1.9% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Colombia or Peru?
- Peru, at 3.6% against 3.1% in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Colombia and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Peru?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Peru rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Colombia ranks 100th and Peru ranks 98th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).