Colombia vs Jordan: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Colombia
- Jordan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 3.1% against 3.0% in Jordan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 100th and Jordan ranks 101st of 149 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.7% | 2.9% | 0.8% | Colombia |
| 1970s | 6.6% | 2.4% | 4.1% | Colombia |
| 1980s | 5.5% | 1.0% | 4.5% | Colombia |
| 1990s | 5.3% | 3.0% | 2.3% | Colombia |
| 2000s | 5.0% | 3.2% | 1.8% | Colombia |
| 2010s | 4.6% | 3.5% | 1.2% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 3.4% | 0.2% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Colombia or Jordan?
- Colombia, at 3.1% against 3.0% in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Colombia and Jordan?
- 0.1%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Jordan?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and Jordan rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Colombia ranks 100th and Jordan ranks 101st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).