Belgium vs Indonesia: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Belgium
- Indonesia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 15.9% against 15.9% in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 52nd of 149 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 5 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 15.0% | 5.4% | 9.7% | Belgium |
| 1980s | 15.0% | 8.8% | 6.2% | Belgium |
| 1990s | 18.8% | 13.2% | 5.6% | Belgium |
| 2000s | 18.5% | 18.0% | 0.5% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 18.2% | 0.3% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 14.3% | 14.2% | 0.1% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Belgium or Indonesia?
- Belgium, at 15.9% against 15.9% in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Belgium and Indonesia?
- 0.0%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Indonesia?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
- How do Belgium and Indonesia rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Belgium ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 52nd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).