Argentina vs Bermuda: Machinery and transport equipment
Machinery and transport equipment over time
- Argentina
- Bermuda
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 13.9% against 13.7% in Argentina, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 60th and Bermuda ranks 57th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Bermuda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Bermuda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.7% | 11.0% | 0.7% | Argentina |
| 2000s | 10.2% | 11.0% | 0.8% | Bermuda |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 13.3% | 1.0% | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 10.8% | 13.9% | 3.0% | Bermuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher machinery and transport equipment, Argentina or Bermuda?
- Bermuda, at 13.9% against 13.7% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in machinery and transport equipment between Argentina and Bermuda?
- 0.2%, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bermuda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Bermuda rank globally for machinery and transport equipment?
- Argentina ranks 60th and Bermuda ranks 57th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Machinery and transport equipment manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 29-35. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).