Chile vs Serbia: Labour productivity by main economic activity - Regions
Labour productivity by main economic activity - Regions over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 56,054 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 43,411 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Serbia, a difference of 12,643 US dollars per worker, PPP converted.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 39th of 41 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52,764 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 33,447 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 19,317 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | Chile |
| 2020s | 56,892 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 39,174 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 17,718 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour productivity by main economic activity - regions, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 56,054 US dollars per worker, PPP converted against 43,411 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in labour productivity by main economic activity - regions between Chile and Serbia?
- 12,643 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for labour productivity by main economic activity - regions?
- Chile ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 39th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour productivity by main economic activity - Regions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on labour productivity, in large regions (TL2) and small regions (TL3). Data source and definition Labour productivity is measured as gross value added per employment at place of work by main economic activity. Regional gross value added and employment data are collected from Eurostat for EU countries and from the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI) delegates or national statistical offices for other countries. To ensure comparability across time and countries, current-price data are converted into constant prices and PPPs. National deflators are used in this dataflow, constant prices measures based on regional deflators are available in the ROPI dataflows. See the Regional data sources. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). See the OECD Territorial grid. Use of economic data on small regions TL3 regions are grouped into typologies based on shared characteristics. For economic analysis, TL3 regions belonging to the same Functional Urban Area (FUA) with more than 250,000 inhabitants are aggregated into a single metropolitan region to reduce distortions from commuting. See the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.