Colombia vs Finland: Key tourism economic indicators — Tourism share of GVA

Colombia
2.2 Percentage of gross value added
in 2024
Finland
2.4 Percentage of gross value added
in 2023
Colombia rank
31st
Finland rank
28th

Key tourism economic indicators — Tourism share of GVA over time

  • Colombia
  • Finland
0123200820162024

How they compare

Finland currently reports 2.4 Percentage of gross value added against 2.2 Percentage of gross value added in Colombia, a difference of 0.2 Percentage of gross value added.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Finland ahead.

Colombia ranks 31st and Finland ranks 28th of 38 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Finland Difference Ahead
2010s 2.2 Percentage of gross value added 2.54 Percentage of gross value added 0.3444 Percentage of gross value added Finland
2020s 1.83 Percentage of gross value added 1.82 Percentage of gross value added 0 Percentage of gross value added Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key tourism economic indicators — tourism share of gva, Colombia or Finland?
Finland, at 2.4 Percentage of gross value added against 2.2 Percentage of gross value added in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in key tourism economic indicators — tourism share of gva between Colombia and Finland?
0.2 Percentage of gross value added, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Finland?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Finland rank globally for key tourism economic indicators — tourism share of gva?
Colombia ranks 31st and Finland ranks 28th of 38 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Key tourism economic indicators — Tourism share of GVA (direct). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Finland: Key tourism economic indicators — Tourism share of GVA. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/key-tourism-economic-indicators-tourism-share-of-gva-direct/colombia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/key-tourism-economic-indicators-tourism-share-of-gva-direct/colombia/finland/">Colombia vs Finland: Key tourism economic indicators — Tourism share of GVA</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Key tourism economic indicators — Tourism share of GVA (direct)
Unit
Percentage of gross value added
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
40 places, 508 data points, 2008–2024
Last refreshed

Tourism GDP corresponds to the part of GDP generated by all industries in response to internal tourism consumption. A further distinction must be made between direct tourism GDP and indirect tourism GDP. Put simply, tourism direct GDP is generated by industries directly in contact with visitors, while indirect tourism GDP is generated by industries supplying inputs to industries directly in contact with the visitors. The Tourism Staellite Account (TSA) Framework limits its recommendations to the evaluation of direct tourism GDP.