Guatemala vs South Africa: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US) … square

Guatemala
403,769 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
387,549 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
87th
South Africa rank
89th

International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US) … square over time

  • Guatemala
  • South Africa
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 403,769 US dollar per square kilometre against 387,549 US dollar per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 16,220 US dollar per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.

Guatemala ranks 87th and South Africa ranks 89th of 169 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 102,174 US dollar per square kilometre 171,515 US dollar per square kilometre 69,341 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 184,217 US dollar per square kilometre 346,310 US dollar per square kilometre 162,092 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 352,300 US dollar per square kilometre 432,651 US dollar per square kilometre 80,351 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per, Guatemala or South Africa?
Guatemala, at 403,769 US dollar per square kilometre against 387,549 US dollar per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per between Guatemala and South Africa?
16,220 US dollar per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Africa?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and South Africa rank globally for international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per?
Guatemala ranks 87th and South Africa ranks 89th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs South Africa: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/south-africa/">Guatemala vs South Africa: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,009 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.