China vs East Timor: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US) … square

China
1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
1.39 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
63rd
East Timor rank
60th

International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US) … square over time

  • China
  • East Timor
0500.0k1.0M1.5M200420132023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 1.39 million US dollar per square kilometre against 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre in China, a difference of 361,850 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.4 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was China ahead.

China ranks 63rd and East Timor ranks 60th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 314,688 US dollar per square kilometre 289,909 US dollar per square kilometre 24,779 US dollar per square kilometre China
2010s 659,192 US dollar per square kilometre 1.04 million US dollar per square kilometre 378,985 US dollar per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 991,696 US dollar per square kilometre 1.40 million US dollar per square kilometre 406,594 US dollar per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per, China or East Timor?
East Timor, at 1.39 million US dollar per square kilometre against 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per between China and East Timor?
361,850 US dollar per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and East Timor?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do China and East Timor rank globally for international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per?
China ranks 63rd and East Timor ranks 60th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs East Timor: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/china/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/china/timor-leste/">China vs East Timor: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,009 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.