China vs Latvia: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US) … square

China
1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
922,941 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
63rd
Latvia rank
66th

International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US) … square over time

  • China
  • Latvia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199520092023

How they compare

China currently reports 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre against 922,941 US dollar per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 102,259 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.

China ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 66th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 226,023 US dollar per square kilometre 306,036 US dollar per square kilometre 80,014 US dollar per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 659,192 US dollar per square kilometre 571,464 US dollar per square kilometre 87,728 US dollar per square kilometre China
2020s 991,696 US dollar per square kilometre 853,802 US dollar per square kilometre 137,895 US dollar per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per, China or Latvia?
China, at 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre against 922,941 US dollar per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per between China and Latvia?
102,259 US dollar per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for international investment position (assets, positions, us dollar), per?
China ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 66th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/international-investment-position-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,009 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

International Investment Position (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.