Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Insurance and financial services
Insurance and financial services over time
- Mauritius
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 7.0% against 6.6% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 197 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.3% | 2.7% | 5.6% | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 8.3% | 3.3% | 5.0% | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 4.9% | 3.3% | 1.6% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 5.5% | 10.3% | 4.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 9.1% | 9.0% | 0.1% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insurance and financial services, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 7.0% against 6.6% in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in insurance and financial services between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for insurance and financial services?
- Mauritius ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Insurance and financial services cover various types of insurance provided to nonresidents by resident insurance enterprises and vice versa, and financial intermediary and auxiliary services (except those of insurance enterprises and pension funds) exchanged between residents and nonresidents. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.