Ecuador vs El Salvador: Insurance and financial services
Insurance and financial services over time
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 14.1% against 14.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 21st of 197 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 14.5% | 9.0% | 5.5% | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 8.8% | 12.6% | 3.8% | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 4.9% | 12.0% | 7.1% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 6.1% | 12.2% | 6.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 11.8% | 17.0% | 5.3% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 12.7% | 17.4% | 4.7% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insurance and financial services, Ecuador or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 14.1% against 14.0% in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in insurance and financial services between Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 0.1%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for insurance and financial services?
- Ecuador ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 21st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Insurance and financial services cover various types of insurance provided to nonresidents by resident insurance enterprises and vice versa, and financial intermediary and auxiliary services (except those of insurance enterprises and pension funds) exchanged between residents and nonresidents. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.