Congo vs Naoero: Insurance and financial services
Insurance and financial services over time
- Congo
- Naoero
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2.1% against 2.0% in Naoero, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 176th and Naoero ranks 177th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.8% | 1.9% | 3.9% | Congo |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 1.2% | 3.3% | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.9% | 3.4% | 0.5% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insurance and financial services, Congo or Naoero?
- Congo, at 2.1% against 2.0% in Naoero as of 2021.
- What is the difference in insurance and financial services between Congo and Naoero?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Naoero?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Naoero rank globally for insurance and financial services?
- Congo ranks 176th and Naoero ranks 177th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Insurance and financial services cover various types of insurance provided to nonresidents by resident insurance enterprises and vice versa, and financial intermediary and auxiliary services (except those of insurance enterprises and pension funds) exchanged between residents and nonresidents. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.