Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Insurance and financial services
Insurance and financial services over time
- Cape Verde
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.5% against 3.5% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 145th and Sri Lanka ranks 144th of 197 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8% | 7.4% | 6.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 0.9% | 7.0% | 6.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 3.9% | 5.6% | 1.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 4.6% | 7.4% | 2.8% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 10.8% | 6.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.9% | 10.3% | 6.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insurance and financial services, Cape Verde or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.5% against 3.5% in Cape Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in insurance and financial services between Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Sri Lanka rank globally for insurance and financial services?
- Cape Verde ranks 145th and Sri Lanka ranks 144th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Insurance and financial services cover various types of insurance provided to nonresidents by resident insurance enterprises and vice versa, and financial intermediary and auxiliary services (except those of insurance enterprises and pension funds) exchanged between residents and nonresidents. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.