Botswana vs Nauru: Insurance and financial services
Insurance and financial services over time
- Botswana
- Nauru
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2.1% against 2.0% in Nauru, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 175th and Nauru ranks 177th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2% | 1.9% | 1.4% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 1.2% | 1.8% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 3.1% | 0.6% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insurance and financial services, Botswana or Nauru?
- Botswana, at 2.1% against 2.0% in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in insurance and financial services between Botswana and Nauru?
- 0.1%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Nauru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Nauru rank globally for insurance and financial services?
- Botswana ranks 175th and Nauru ranks 177th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Insurance and financial services cover various types of insurance provided to nonresidents by resident insurance enterprises and vice versa, and financial intermediary and auxiliary services (except those of insurance enterprises and pension funds) exchanged between residents and nonresidents. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.