Tanzania, United Republic of vs Palestine, State of: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Tanzania, United Republic of
8,482 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Palestine, State of
8,226 constant 2015 US$
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
137th
Palestine, State of rank
138th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Palestine, State of
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k199120082025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 8,482 constant 2015 US$ against 8,226 constant 2015 US$ in Palestine, State of, a difference of 256 constant 2015 US$.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 137th and Palestine, State of ranks 138th of 176 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 2,424 constant 2015 US$ 10,485 constant 2015 US$ 8,061 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of
2000s 3,809 constant 2015 US$ 10,739 constant 2015 US$ 6,930 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of
2010s 6,291 constant 2015 US$ 12,233 constant 2015 US$ 5,942 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of
2020s 7,941 constant 2015 US$ 8,906 constant 2015 US$ 964.85 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Tanzania, United Republic of or Palestine, State of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 8,482 constant 2015 US$ against 8,226 constant 2015 US$ in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Tanzania, United Republic of and Palestine, State of?
256 constant 2015 US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Palestine, State of?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Palestine, State of rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 137th and Palestine, State of ranks 138th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Palestine, State of: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/tanzania/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/tanzania/west-bank-and-gaza/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Palestine, State of: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.