Late-demographic dividend vs Netherlands: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Late-demographic dividend
28,956 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Netherlands
121,110 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
12th
Netherlands rank
11th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Netherlands
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199120082025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 121,110 constant 2015 US$ against 28,956 constant 2015 US$ in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 92,154 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 4.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 44 groups.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 7,688 constant 2015 US$ 61,002 constant 2015 US$ 53,313 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands
2000s 12,688 constant 2015 US$ 77,822 constant 2015 US$ 65,133 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands
2010s 20,491 constant 2015 US$ 95,980 constant 2015 US$ 75,489 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands
2020s 26,938 constant 2015 US$ 116,298 constant 2015 US$ 89,360 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Late-demographic dividend or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 121,110 constant 2015 US$ against 28,956 constant 2015 US$ in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Late-demographic dividend and Netherlands?
92,154 constant 2015 US$, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Netherlands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Netherlands rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Netherlands: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/late-demographic-dividend/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/late-demographic-dividend/netherlands/">Late-demographic dividend vs Netherlands: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.