Hong Kong, China vs Portugal: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Hong Kong, China
41,254 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Portugal
37,917 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
46th
Portugal rank
49th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Portugal
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199520102025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 41,254 constant 2015 US$ against 37,917 constant 2015 US$ in Portugal, a difference of 3,337 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 46th and Portugal ranks 49th of 176 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 31,629 constant 2015 US$ 28,101 constant 2015 US$ 3,529 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 40,075 constant 2015 US$ 34,723 constant 2015 US$ 5,352 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 40,337 constant 2015 US$ 36,588 constant 2015 US$ 3,749 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Hong Kong, China or Portugal?
Hong Kong, China, at 41,254 constant 2015 US$ against 37,917 constant 2015 US$ in Portugal as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Hong Kong, China and Portugal?
3,337 constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Portugal?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Portugal rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Hong Kong, China ranks 46th and Portugal ranks 49th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Portugal: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/portugal/">Hong Kong, China vs Portugal: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.