Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Panama: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
8,047 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Panama
52,194 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
31st
Panama rank
34th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Panama
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199120082025

How they compare

Panama currently reports 52,194 constant 2015 US$ against 8,047 constant 2015 US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 44,147 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Panama's figure about 6.5 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 31st and Panama ranks 34th of 44 groups.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 3,770 constant 2015 US$ 19,240 constant 2015 US$ 15,470 constant 2015 US$ Panama
2000s 4,414 constant 2015 US$ 19,952 constant 2015 US$ 15,539 constant 2015 US$ Panama
2010s 5,798 constant 2015 US$ 42,368 constant 2015 US$ 36,570 constant 2015 US$ Panama
2020s 7,157 constant 2015 US$ 48,740 constant 2015 US$ 41,582 constant 2015 US$ Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Panama?
Panama, at 52,194 constant 2015 US$ against 8,047 constant 2015 US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Panama?
44,147 constant 2015 US$, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Panama?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Panama rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 31st and Panama ranks 34th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Panama: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/panama/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Panama: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.