Europe & Central Asia vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Europe & Central Asia
59,106 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Singapore
220,088 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia rank
7th
Singapore rank
6th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Singapore
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199120082025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 220,088 constant 2015 US$ against 59,106 constant 2015 US$ in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 160,982 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 3.7 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 7th and Singapore ranks 6th of 46 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 35,485 constant 2015 US$ 50,302 constant 2015 US$ 14,817 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2000s 42,730 constant 2015 US$ 80,617 constant 2015 US$ 37,887 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2010s 48,179 constant 2015 US$ 138,197 constant 2015 US$ 90,018 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2020s 54,867 constant 2015 US$ 205,364 constant 2015 US$ 150,497 constant 2015 US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Europe & Central Asia or Singapore?
Singapore, at 220,088 constant 2015 US$ against 59,106 constant 2015 US$ in Europe & Central Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Europe & Central Asia and Singapore?
160,982 constant 2015 US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Singapore?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Singapore rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 7th and Singapore ranks 6th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/europe-and-central-asia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/europe-and-central-asia/singapore/">Europe & Central Asia vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.