Early-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Early-demographic dividend
11,796 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
New Zealand
69,596 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Early-demographic dividend rank
31st
New Zealand rank
29th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • New Zealand
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199120082025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 69,596 constant 2015 US$ against 11,796 constant 2015 US$ in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 57,800 constant 2015 US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 5.9 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 46 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 11,037 constant 2015 US$ 64,310 constant 2015 US$ 53,273 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2000s 11,109 constant 2015 US$ 72,482 constant 2015 US$ 61,373 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2010s 11,708 constant 2015 US$ 76,162 constant 2015 US$ 64,455 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2020s 12,563 constant 2015 US$ 72,246 constant 2015 US$ 59,682 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Early-demographic dividend or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 69,596 constant 2015 US$ against 11,796 constant 2015 US$ in Early-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Early-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
57,800 constant 2015 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Early-demographic dividend and New Zealand rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/early-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/early-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/">Early-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.