Djibouti vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Djibouti
51,907 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
8,047 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Djibouti rank
35th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
33rd

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Djibouti
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199120082025

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 51,907 constant 2015 US$ against 8,047 constant 2015 US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 43,860 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 6.5 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 35th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 33rd of 176 countries.

Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
2010s 34,940 constant 2015 US$ 5,957 constant 2015 US$ 28,983 constant 2015 US$ Djibouti
2020s 45,439 constant 2015 US$ 7,157 constant 2015 US$ 38,281 constant 2015 US$ Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Djibouti or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Djibouti, at 51,907 constant 2015 US$ against 8,047 constant 2015 US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Djibouti and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
43,860 constant 2015 US$, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Djibouti and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Djibouti ranks 35th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 33rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/djibouti/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/djibouti/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Djibouti vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.