Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Central Europe and the Baltics
30,224 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Singapore
220,088 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
11th
Singapore rank
6th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Singapore
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199120082025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 220,088 constant 2015 US$ against 30,224 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 189,864 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 7.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 6th of 46 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 13,895 constant 2015 US$ 56,870 constant 2015 US$ 42,975 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2000s 19,461 constant 2015 US$ 80,617 constant 2015 US$ 61,156 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2010s 26,330 constant 2015 US$ 138,197 constant 2015 US$ 111,867 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2020s 29,031 constant 2015 US$ 205,364 constant 2015 US$ 176,333 constant 2015 US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Central Europe and the Baltics or Singapore?
Singapore, at 220,088 constant 2015 US$ against 30,224 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore?
189,864 constant 2015 US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 6th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/singapore/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.