Central Europe and the Baltics vs Netherlands: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Central Europe and the Baltics
30,224 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Netherlands
121,110 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
9th
Netherlands rank
11th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Netherlands
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199120082025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 121,110 constant 2015 US$ against 30,224 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 90,886 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 4.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 44 groups.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 13,895 constant 2015 US$ 63,501 constant 2015 US$ 49,606 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands
2000s 19,461 constant 2015 US$ 77,822 constant 2015 US$ 58,361 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands
2010s 26,330 constant 2015 US$ 95,980 constant 2015 US$ 69,650 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands
2020s 29,031 constant 2015 US$ 116,298 constant 2015 US$ 87,267 constant 2015 US$ Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Central Europe and the Baltics or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 121,110 constant 2015 US$ against 30,224 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Central Europe and the Baltics and Netherlands?
90,886 constant 2015 US$, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Netherlands?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Netherlands rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Netherlands: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/netherlands/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Netherlands: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.