Canada vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Canada
106,575 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
26,628 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Canada rank
14th
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
16th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Canada
  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199120082025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 106,575 constant 2015 US$ against 26,628 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 79,947 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Canada's figure about 4.0 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 14th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 16th of 176 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 86,140 constant 2015 US$ 6,658 constant 2015 US$ 79,482 constant 2015 US$ Canada
2000s 92,352 constant 2015 US$ 10,191 constant 2015 US$ 82,161 constant 2015 US$ Canada
2010s 103,132 constant 2015 US$ 18,023 constant 2015 US$ 85,109 constant 2015 US$ Canada
2020s 105,887 constant 2015 US$ 24,486 constant 2015 US$ 81,401 constant 2015 US$ Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Canada or East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Canada, at 106,575 constant 2015 US$ against 26,628 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Canada and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
79,947 constant 2015 US$, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Canada and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Canada ranks 14th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 16th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/canada/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/canada/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Canada vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.