Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Bosnia and Herzegovina
11,718 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
North Macedonia
12,376 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
North Macedonia rank
116th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • North Macedonia
05.0k10.0k15.0k199120082025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 12,376 constant 2015 US$ against 11,718 constant 2015 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 658 constant 2015 US$.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and North Macedonia ranks 116th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 6,868 constant 2015 US$ 8,063 constant 2015 US$ 1,195 constant 2015 US$ North Macedonia
2010s 10,536 constant 2015 US$ 11,722 constant 2015 US$ 1,187 constant 2015 US$ North Macedonia
2020s 11,716 constant 2015 US$ 11,427 constant 2015 US$ 288.63 constant 2015 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Bosnia and Herzegovina or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 12,376 constant 2015 US$ against 11,718 constant 2015 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
658 constant 2015 US$, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and North Macedonia ranks 116th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/north-macedonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.