Africa Western and Central vs Lithuania: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Africa Western and Central
5,674 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Lithuania
40,860 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Africa Western and Central rank
44th
Lithuania rank
47th

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Africa Western and Central
  • Lithuania
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120082025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 40,860 constant 2015 US$ against 5,674 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Western and Central, a difference of 35,186 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 7.2 times Africa Western and Central's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Africa Western and Central ahead.

Africa Western and Central ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 47th of 44 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Western and Central Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 10,356 constant 2015 US$ 11,122 constant 2015 US$ 766.27 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2000s 9,799 constant 2015 US$ 20,170 constant 2015 US$ 10,370 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2010s 8,321 constant 2015 US$ 32,821 constant 2015 US$ 24,500 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2020s 5,852 constant 2015 US$ 39,582 constant 2015 US$ 33,729 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Africa Western and Central or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 40,860 constant 2015 US$ against 5,674 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Western and Central as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Africa Western and Central and Lithuania?
35,186 constant 2015 US$, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Western and Central and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Africa Western and Central and Lithuania rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Africa Western and Central ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 47th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Western and Central vs Lithuania: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-western-and-central/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-western-and-central/lithuania/">Africa Western and Central vs Lithuania: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.