Africa Eastern and Southern vs Equatorial Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added per worker

Africa Eastern and Southern
10,679 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
53,308 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
30th
Equatorial Guinea rank
33rd

Industry (including construction), value added per worker over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Equatorial Guinea
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199120082025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 53,308 constant 2015 US$ against 10,679 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 42,629 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 5.0 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 30th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd of 44 groups.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 9,777 constant 2015 US$ 243,810 constant 2015 US$ 234,033 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 10,556 constant 2015 US$ 144,156 constant 2015 US$ 133,600 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2020s 10,594 constant 2015 US$ 71,171 constant 2015 US$ 60,578 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added per worker, Africa Eastern and Southern or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 53,308 constant 2015 US$ against 10,679 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added per worker between Africa Eastern and Southern and Equatorial Guinea?
42,629 constant 2015 US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Equatorial Guinea?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for industry (including construction), value added per worker?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 30th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Equatorial Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-eastern-and-southern/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-eastern-and-southern/equatorial-guinea/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Equatorial Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,148 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in this sector to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.