East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Libya: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.3558 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Libya
0.7325 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
5th
Libya rank
2nd

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Libya
0.20.40.60.8196019922025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.7325 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.3558 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.3767 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Libya's figure about 2.1 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 5th and Libya ranks 2nd of 47 groups.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Libya Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4452 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7818 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3366 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
2010s 0.4087 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5148 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1061 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
2020s 0.3686 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6556 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.287 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Libya?
Libya, at 0.7325 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.3558 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Libya?
0.3767 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Libya?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Libya rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 5th and Libya ranks 2nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Libya: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/libya/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Libya: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
255 places, 11,330 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.