East Asia & Pacific vs Hong Kong, China: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific
439,115 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
22.78 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
6th
Hong Kong, China rank
5th

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Hong Kong, China
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 22.78 million current US$ per square kilometre against 439,115 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 22.34 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 51.9 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 5th of 47 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 149,371 current US$ per square kilometre 15.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 327,969 current US$ per square kilometre 19.68 million current US$ per square kilometre 19.35 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 430,700 current US$ per square kilometre 21.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 20.94 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 22.78 million current US$ per square kilometre against 439,115 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Hong Kong, China?
22.34 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Hong Kong, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Hong Kong, China rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Hong Kong, China: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/hong-kong-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific vs Hong Kong, China: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
253 places, 10,691 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.