Cyprus vs Malaysia: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

Cyprus
430,232 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
457,282 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
59th
Malaysia rank
57th

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

  • Cyprus
  • Malaysia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 457,282 current US$ per square kilometre against 430,232 current US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 27,050 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 59th and Malaysia ranks 57th of 205 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 27,373 current US$ per square kilometre 16,601 current US$ per square kilometre 10,772 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 90,178 current US$ per square kilometre 36,673 current US$ per square kilometre 53,505 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 193,814 current US$ per square kilometre 95,538 current US$ per square kilometre 98,276 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 343,833 current US$ per square kilometre 201,209 current US$ per square kilometre 142,624 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 307,960 current US$ per square kilometre 376,597 current US$ per square kilometre 68,637 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 378,198 current US$ per square kilometre 434,717 current US$ per square kilometre 56,519 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, Cyprus or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 457,282 current US$ per square kilometre against 430,232 current US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between Cyprus and Malaysia?
27,050 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Malaysia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Malaysia rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?
Cyprus ranks 59th and Malaysia ranks 57th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Malaysia: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/malaysia/">Cyprus vs Malaysia: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
253 places, 10,691 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.