Curaçao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

Curaçao
863,791 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
22,167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
43rd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
43rd

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

  • Curaçao
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M198120022023

How they compare

Curaçao currently reports 863,791 current US$ per square kilometre against 22,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 841,624 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Curaçao's figure about 39.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.

Curaçao ranks 43rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 43rd of 205 countries.

Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 19,688 current US$ per square kilometre 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre Curaçao
2020s 757,128 current US$ per square kilometre 21,614 current US$ per square kilometre 735,514 current US$ per square kilometre Curaçao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, Curaçao or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Curaçao, at 863,791 current US$ per square kilometre against 22,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between Curaçao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
841,624 current US$ per square kilometre, with Curaçao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curaçao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?
Curaçao ranks 43rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 43rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Curaçao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
253 places, 10,691 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.