Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
377.87 current US$ per person
in 2025
Lithuania
7,299 current US$ per person
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
45th
Lithuania rank
45th

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k198220032025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 7,299 current US$ per person against 377.87 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 6,921 current US$ per person.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 19.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 45th and Lithuania ranks 45th of 47 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 71.15 current US$ per person 744.75 current US$ per person 673.6 current US$ per person Lithuania
2000s 124.4 current US$ per person 2,255 current US$ per person 2,131 current US$ per person Lithuania
2010s 232.3 current US$ per person 4,198 current US$ per person 3,966 current US$ per person Lithuania
2020s 309.63 current US$ per person 6,383 current US$ per person 6,073 current US$ per person Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 7,299 current US$ per person against 377.87 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
6,921 current US$ per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 45th and Lithuania ranks 45th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
255 places, 11,330 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.