How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Niger?

60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Niger: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

Gambia

145.49 current US$ per person

in 2025

Niger

145.14 current US$ per person

in 2025

Gambia rank

194th

Niger rank

195th

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

Gambia
Niger

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 145.49 current US$ per person against 145.14 current US$ per person in Niger, a difference of 0.35 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 194th and Niger ranks 195th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 4 and Niger in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Niger	Difference	Ahead
1960s	7.56 current US$ per person	6.87 current US$ per person	0.6901 current US$ per person	Gambia
1970s	16.68 current US$ per person	25.69 current US$ per person	9.01 current US$ per person	Niger
1980s	31.32 current US$ per person	56.58 current US$ per person	25.26 current US$ per person	Niger
1990s	91.83 current US$ per person	66.44 current US$ per person	25.39 current US$ per person	Gambia
2000s	72.74 current US$ per person	59.17 current US$ per person	13.57 current US$ per person	Gambia
2010s	100.16 current US$ per person	119.07 current US$ per person	18.91 current US$ per person	Niger
2020s	133.34 current US$ per person	120.19 current US$ per person	13.15 current US$ per person	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, Gambia or Niger?: Gambia, at 145.49 current US$ per person against 145.14 current US$ per person in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between Gambia and Niger?: 0.35 current US$ per person, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Niger?: 60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Niger rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?: Gambia ranks 194th and Niger ranks 195th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Niger: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-capita/gambia-the/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-capita/gambia-the/niger/">Gambia vs Niger: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 11,330 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.