How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lesotho?

63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Lesotho: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per

Chad

273.4 current US$ per person

in 2025

Lesotho

273.96 current US$ per person

in 2025

Chad rank

181st

Lesotho rank

180th

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per over time

Chad
Lesotho

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 273.96 current US$ per person against 273.4 current US$ per person in Chad, a difference of 0.56 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 181st and Lesotho ranks 180th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Lesotho	Difference	Ahead
1960s	14.63 current US$ per person	4.76 current US$ per person	9.87 current US$ per person	Chad
1970s	24.75 current US$ per person	20.81 current US$ per person	3.94 current US$ per person	Chad
1980s	27.47 current US$ per person	41.9 current US$ per person	14.44 current US$ per person	Lesotho
1990s	30.92 current US$ per person	133.6 current US$ per person	102.67 current US$ per person	Lesotho
2000s	228.46 current US$ per person	255.48 current US$ per person	27.02 current US$ per person	Lesotho
2010s	384.86 current US$ per person	354.67 current US$ per person	30.19 current US$ per person	Chad
2020s	274.23 current US$ per person	294.31 current US$ per person	20.08 current US$ per person	Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per, Chad or Lesotho?: Lesotho, at 273.96 current US$ per person against 273.4 current US$ per person in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per between Chad and Lesotho?: 0.56 current US$ per person, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lesotho?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Chad and Lesotho rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current us$), per?: Chad ranks 181st and Lesotho ranks 180th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Lesotho: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-capita/chad/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-us-per-capita/chad/lesotho/">Chad vs Lesotho: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 255 places, 11,330 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Industry (including construction), value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.