Tunisia vs Zambia: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per

Tunisia
232,212 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
263,244 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
168th
Zambia rank
166th

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zambia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 263,244 current LCU per square kilometre against 232,212 current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 31,032 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 168th and Zambia ranks 166th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 765.96 current LCU per square kilometre 0.7803 current LCU per square kilometre 765.18 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 2,714 current LCU per square kilometre 1.07 current LCU per square kilometre 2,713 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 13,132 current LCU per square kilometre 8.69 current LCU per square kilometre 13,123 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 31,771 current LCU per square kilometre 1,335 current LCU per square kilometre 30,436 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 74,512 current LCU per square kilometre 14,767 current LCU per square kilometre 59,745 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 150,199 current LCU per square kilometre 86,868 current LCU per square kilometre 63,331 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 207,118 current LCU per square kilometre 231,630 current LCU per square kilometre 24,512 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per, Tunisia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 263,244 current LCU per square kilometre against 232,212 current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per between Tunisia and Zambia?
31,032 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zambia rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
Tunisia ranks 168th and Zambia ranks 166th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zambia: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zambia/">Tunisia vs Zambia: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.